Springbok Exodus: The real problem

Like it? Share it.

Though countless rumours suggested that it was imminent, I didn’t want to believe it. Then, a day or two ago, it was confirmed: Duane Vermeulen has signed a three year deal with French club Toulon.

My heart sank.

While my sadness can partly be attributed to the fact that Toulon has smashed a giant dent in WP Rugby’s Super 15 aspirations, the bigger issue is that South Africa is finding it increasingly difficult to hang on to our top talent.

Duane isn’t going to be alone up there. Bismarck and Jannie are leaving, Spies is leaving, Kitshoff is leaving, and so are many others.

They are leaving in droves.

You can’t really blame the players. Not at all.

For them, it’s an opportunity to experience a different culture, to play against some of the world’s top stars, with some of the world’s greatest coaches and to earn (as of today) 13,97 times more than they would’ve had they stayed in SA.

For young, talented players it’s tantamount to a dream job. And the best part is that while they’re over there they still have the opportunity to play for the Springboks. Sweet deal.

From a SARU/Provincial union point of view however, I’m sure there is massive cause for concern. They’d want to stop the exodus.

But what can SARU do to try and keep the players in the country? Is there anything?

Sure, they can reverse their policy of selecting overseas-based players but then they’d be creating an ultimatum between the pride of the jersey and a wad of foreign notes. Not a great message.

The other option is to pay them more, but with exchange rates being what they are that isn’t likely to work either. SARU and our local unions simply don’t have the budget.

Our ultimate enemy here is the Rand and unfortunately that is something that is totally out of SARU’s control.

My feeling is that we’ll have to ride it out for now and if, in the future, our currency is able to compete with Europe we can look at adjusting the policy.

What do you think should happen? Got a suggestion? We’d love to hear from you. Hit us with an opinionated comment or a tweet @leftbacks and let’s get the banter going.

2 comments:

  1. I, for one, am not concerned about the so-called Bok exodus. With the exception of one or two youngsters, Kitshoff is a good example, all the players that are leaving have played dozens of tests for at least 6 – 8 years. Yes, class is permanent, but I see the exodus as a prime opportunity for the unions to fast-track new, exciting talent. Look at Kolbe, he was billed as Aplon 2.0, but only really got his chance to shine once Aplon left…and he grabbed it with both hands…even Coach Meyer is having a look at him. We need to stop clinging onto “what worked in the past”, SA Rugby needs to evolve the game, not adapt. That’s how NZ and Australia(in the past) got ahead of the rest.

    1. Thanks for the comment Riaan, always dig a bit of banter with you!

      I think thats an important point you just made – generally it’s the more seasoned guys who go, meaning it’s an opportunity to blood some fresh talent.

      But when a guy like Kitshoff goes it becomes a Springbok emergency in that if we don’t cap him – in 3 years time he could be playing for France which is definitely what you don’t want.

      That said, there’s not much SARU can do about that – see Jacques Du Plessis from the Bulls is also going. Think when the younger guys go it’s far more about an irresistible some of cash.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *